« Brian MacQuarrie: Writing a Story of Grief, Anger, and Redemption | Main | Christopher M. Finan: Supreme Court Case Threatens Free Speech »

August 04, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e54ed2b7aa88330120a4c6005d970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference David W. Moore: Gallup’s Anti-Health Care Bias:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Steve

Wow. Polling around health care has seemed especially messy, and not only for Gallup, for reasons you give (not only here but in your book): this particular Gallup poll seems like a especially ugly example of opinion making (as you put it) rather than opinion finding. I've noticed that the "upstart" polling companies, most of which use IRV and most of which did well in last year's election polling (PPP and SUSA in particular) have stayed away from national healthcare questions, the kind where you are polling an uninformed public about complex policy matters, and the kind (as you show) where question choice and question wording can create "opinion" and determine the answer. I've been following, instead, approve/ disapprove and trial-heat election matchups, which people like PPP keep running (though I know those are flawed too, for reasons you give in your book): those polls seem to suggest that Americans want problems fixed and disapprove of leaders (state governors, for example) who seem unable to fix them. It's an "opinion" the President probably shares.

Irene hernandez

Gallup's poll stating that only 50 per cent of Americans favored Health Care Reform was biased in that no Americans of Hispanic or Spanish heritage were included in the study. That is a slap in the face to many Americans, including those whose parents, grandparents and grandparents were born in the United States!

James

I would have to agree. Another stupid poll they drug out was how much Americans thought their current health care would be affected.

A majority (about 30-40%) usually said that their plan would be worse off. While everyone else (30ish% won't change, 30ish%improve) said it would stay the same or improve.

But he kept stating that the 30-40 percent with health care was the majority. The most idiotic thing about the poll is that it didn't include people without health care insurance - which I thought was the whole reason for the bill.

Sadly, I think the point was lost...

The comments to this entry are closed.

Our Community

Beacon Press on Scribd

About Beacon Broadside

  • Beacon Broadside, a project of Beacon Press, is an online venue for essays, news items, and dispatches from respected writers, thinkers, and activists about our times.
  • Read More | Fine Print | Contact
Subscribe to Beacon BroadsideVisit the Beacon Press Facebook Fan Page

Categories

Related Posts with Thumbnails